Legal Opinion

Michigan Oil Co. v. Natural Resources Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1979No. 59088, (Calendar No. 5)PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blair Moody, Jr., J.

The issue before the Court is whether the Natural Resources Commission (NRC) properly denied Michigan Oil’s permit application for oil and gas drilling on a 40-acre site of state-owned land known as Corwith 1-22 in July of 1972. Beyond this apparently simple question are broad policy considerations; therefore, it is necessary to fully understand the factual setting of the instant case before addressing the legal issues set forth.

Background

Corwith 1-22, the 40-acre site involved in the instant controversy, is located in the Pigeon River Country State Forest (hereinafter the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. VanderklootMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
  2. City of Detroit v. Michigan Bell Telephone Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Michigan Oil Co. v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. West Michigan Environmental Action Council v. Natural Resources CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Michigan Oil Co. v. Department of Natural ResourcesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  3. Orion Township v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. ATTORNEY GENERAL Ex Rel DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES v. CHEBOYGAN COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY ROAD COMMISSIONERSMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Iliescu v. Reg'l Transp. Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Nevada · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API