Legal Opinion
Berryman v. Smith (In Re Smith)
United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona
Decided March 23, 1988No. Bankruptcy No. B-85-3921-PHX-RGM, Adv. No. 86-597PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR JURY TRIAL
ROBERT G. MOOREMAN, Chief Judge.
FACTS
This action arises out of the Berrymans’ (plaintiffs’) attempted purchase from the Smiths (debtors), of a “Bar and Grill” as well as other real property (the property), located in Phoenix, Arizona. In order to sell the property, the debtors were first required to exercise an option to buy certain land in which they possessed a leasehold interest. Their failure to exercise this option prevented the debtors from conveying good title to the plaintiffs. Approximately 3 months after having ostensibly…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Katchen v. LandySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Barton v. BarbourSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Acolyte Electric Corp. v. City of New YorkUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1986
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Thomas M. Germain, Trustee for the Estate of O'sullivan's Fuel Oil Co., Inc. v. The Connecticut National BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- N.I.S. Corp. v. Hallahan (In re Hallahan)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Schieber v. Hooper (In Re Hooper)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Hallahan v. HallahanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Weeks v. Kramer (In Re Weeks Securities, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1988
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.