H. David Boyter and Angela M. Boyter v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WINTER, Chief Judge:
Taxpayers (H. David Boyter and his sometime wife, Angela M. Boyter), both of whom are domiciled in Maryland, ask us to *1383reverse the Tax Court and to rule that for the tax years 1975 and 1976 they successfully avoided the “marriage penalty” of the Internal Revenue Code. The “marriage penalty” results from the fact that a man and woman who are husband and wife on the last day of the taxable year, each having separate income, are taxed, in the aggregate, in a greater amount if they file either joint or separate income tax returns than would be the case if they were unmarried.1…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Gregory v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lucas v. EarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Commissioner v. Court Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Commissioner v. TowerSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Rice's Toyota World, Inc. (Formerly Rice Auto Sales, Inc.) v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Friedman v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1989
- Bettius & Sanderson, P.C. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa., Bettius & Sanderson, P.C. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- West American Insurance v. Bank of Isle of WightDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987
- Pedersen v. Office of Personnel ManagementDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2012
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.