Legal Opinion
Curran v. Graf
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 13, 2004PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Costello, J.), dated December 15, 2003, which denied their motion for leave to enter judgment against the defendants William Graf and Janice Graf upon their default in appearing or answering and deemed the proposed verified answer of those defendants to have been served.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the plaintiffs’ motion for leave to enter a judgment against the respondents…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Tewari v. TsoutsourasNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Bartoo v. BuellNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Lichtman v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Rosenberg v. Eternal Memorials, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gross v. KailAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- O'Loughlin v. DelisserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- U.S. Bank, N.A. v. DickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. North Shore Univ. Hosp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2018