Legal Opinion

Vilma Granado v. Pedro C. Meza

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 19, 2013No. 11-0976PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In this appeal, the trial court confirmed arrearages of $500. The proffered support for this finding is: (1) a clerical error by the Office of the Attorney General (OAG) mistakenly reflecting that the child-support obligation ended 12 years early, and (2) a statement in the OAG’s Child Support Disbursement Unit Payment Record (Payment Record) that the Record might not include payments made to local registries. The clerical error is no evidence of arrearages because the OAG could not modify this child-support obligation. And because the obligor testified that he only paid the OAG, the Payment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Williams v. PattonTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Office of Attorney General of Texas v. BurtonTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Granado v. Meza, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Whataburger Restaurants LLC v. Yvonne Cardwell, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2014
  2. Regent Care of San Antonio, L.P. v. Robert H. Detrick and Carolyn Dart DetrickTexas Supreme Court · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API