Amend v. Equitable Life Assurance Co. of United States
Civil Court of the City of New York
1Opinion of the CourtMabtiw B. Stecheb, J.
Decision was reserved on the defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint at the end of the plaintiff’s case; and thereafter the jury found for the plaintiff. The action was brought by a benefiiciary to recover under the double indemnity provisions of a life insurance policy. In order to recover, she was required to prove, in the language of the policy, that death “ resulted from accidental bodily injury, directly and independently of all other causes ” and was neither “ caused [nor] contributed to, directly or indirectly, by disease or illness of any kind, [or] physical or mental infirmity.”
Di…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- McGrail v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Burr v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- McMartin v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Sugarman v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1962
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Svensson v. Securian Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Ajnoha v. JC Penney Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2007
- Marlene S. Brothers v. CUNY Insurance Group of CMFG Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2025