Legal Opinion

Willingham v. Department of Labor

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided February 9, 2007No. 2:06-cv-00091PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROBINSON, District Judge.

Lavetta Willingham, a pro se Plaintiff, has filed a claim under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act. She alleges that exposure to radiation while working at the Pantex Plant in Amarillo, Texas caused her breast and skin cancers. After an administrative adjudication, the Department of Labor denied Plaintiffs claim. She has filed suit for review of that decision. The Court grants the Department of Labor’s motion for summary judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

The Department of Energy has a nuclear facility in Amarillo, Texas named the Pantex Plant.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Mississippi Hospital Ass'n v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. Louisiana ex rel. Guste v. VerityCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Blackwater Diving, LLC v. U. S. Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
  2. Gadhave v. ThompsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2023
  3. Goncharov v. RichardsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2022
  4. Javakhadze v. MayorkasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2023
  5. Lukas Nakos v. United States Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API