Legal Opinion
Frank B. Killian & Co. v. Allied Latex Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 21, 1950PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BONDY, District Judge.
This is an action for infringement of Killian Patents No. 1,605,445, issued November 2, 1926, and No. 2,128,827, issued August 30, 1938, both relating to the art of manufacturing thin dipped rubber articles and particularly prophylactics.
Patent No. 1,605,445 is for a machine for the manufacture of uniform annular beads on the open end of thin rubber tubular articles. The machine of this patent was the first to roll such beads. It went into immediate use throughout the industry and completely replaced the former method of rolling such beads by hand. It has never been…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Ray-O-Vac Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Hildreth v. MastorasSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Dangler v. Imperial MacH. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Frank B. Killian & Co. v. Allied Latex Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951