Legal Opinion

Hencely v. Fluor Corporation

District Court, D. South Carolina

Decided August 13, 2021No. 6:19-cv-00489Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA GREENVILLE DIVISION Winston Tyler Hencely, Civil Action No. 6:19-00489-BHH Plaintiff, v. OPINION AND ORDER Fluor Corporation; Fluor Enterprises, Inc.; Fluor Intercontinental, Inc.; Fluor Government Group International, Inc., Defendants. This matter is before the Court on Defendants Fluor Corporation, Fluor Enterprises, Inc., Fluor Intercontinental, Inc., and Fluor Government Group International, Inc.’s (collectively “Defendants” or “Fluor”) motion, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(c), for partial judgment on the pleadings…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Philips v. Pitt County Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2009
  4. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. Boyle v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API