Legal Opinion
City of Newark v. Padula
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 30, 1953PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
24 N.J. Super. 483 (1953)
94 A.2d 859
THE CITY OF NEWARK, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ARTHUR H. PADULA AND MARGARET C. PADULA, HIS WIFE, CONCETTA PADULA, VINCENT PADULA AND ALFRED L. PADULA, AS EXECUTORS OF THE ESTATE OF JAMES V. PADULA, AND GARDEN CONSTRUCTION CO., A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.
Decided January 30, 1953.
Mr. Charles Handler, attorney for plaintiff.
Messrs. Bilder, Bilder & Kaufman (Mr. Samuel Kaufman appearing), attorneys for Padula defendants.
Messrs. Kasen, Schnitzer &…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
- Kopczynski v. County of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Nichols v. Board of Education, Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Pennsylvania-Reading Seashore Lines v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
- Burdett v. Municipal Employees Pension Commission of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Terracciona v. MageeNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- City of Newark v. PadulaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953