D.N. Ex Rel. Nelson v. Snyder
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
CHRISTOPHER C. CONNER, District Judge.
Arthur Nelson IV and Marie Nelson bring this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on behalf of minors D.N. and S.N. 1 The complaint raises claims under three doctrines of due process liability: the special relationship theory, the state-created danger theory, and the Monell theory of municipal liability. Defendants have filed a motion to dismiss, arguing that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. 13.) For the reasons that follow, the motion will be granted in part and denied in part.
1. Statement…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- M.U. ex rel. Urban v. Downingtown High School EastDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- K.S.S. v. Montgomery County Board of CommissionersDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Meyers v. Cincinnati Bd. of Educ.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
- Bryan v. Erie County Office of Children & YouthDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Hamilton v. SpriggleDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.