Legal Opinion

Sohaey v. Van Cura

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1994No. 75212PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Heiple

Resolution of this case requires this court to determine (1) whether trial courts have discretion in fashioning a sanction for a technical violation of Rule 220, and (2) whether defendants can be considered prevailing parties under the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1991, ch. 1211/2, par. 261 et seq.) and thereby receive attorney fees.

As the full details of this case are thoroughly set forth in the opinion below (240 Ill. App. 3d 266), we review only those facts necessary for the resolution of this appeal.

BACKGROUND

Dr. Manutchehr Sohaey and Dr. Mehdi…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barth v. ReaganIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Sohaey v. Van CuraAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Bright v. DickeIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Vision Point of Sale, Inc. v. HaasIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Holston v. Sisters of Third Order of St. FrancisIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Sobczak v. FlaskaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1998
  5. Decker v. Domino's Pizza, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API