Legal Opinion

Rhoades v. United States

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided December 18, 1996No. Civil Action 95-616 MMSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiffs Viktoria T. Rhoades and Donald Rhoades filed this personal injury suit against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (“FTCA”), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-80. Specifically, plaintiffs assert the United States was negligent in maintaining the Dover Air Force Base Exchange (the “Base Exchange”) and this negligence caused their personal injuries. In an amended complaint, plaintiffs added a count in negligence against R.S. Hogan Inc. (“Hogan”), a Maryland corporation that had been performing renovations at the Base…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. John D. Williamson, Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Gordon G. Tucker, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Mortensen v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  4. Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lumpkins v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
  2. White v. United States Government Department of Treasury-Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Kosicki v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API