Legal Opinion

Voerding v. State

Montana Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2006No. 05-534PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

¶1 Ted Matthew Voerding (“Voerding”), pro se, appeals from the Order of the District Court of the Fourth Judicial District, Missoula County, partially denying his Petition for Post-Conviction Relief. We affirm.

¶2 The sole issue on appeal is whether the District Court correctly interpreted § 46-18-403(2), MCA (1999), as requiring credit for time served against fines only, and not against other court-imposed financial obligations such as fees, costs, and charges.

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶3 In November of 2000, Voerding pled guilty to the offense of intimidation, a felony, in violation…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. HeathMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. State v. MuhammadMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Orr v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Griffin v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Porter v. StateMontana Supreme Court · 2002

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BranamMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  2. State v. VanWinkleMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  3. City of Bozeman v. KingMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  4. City of Bozeman v. KingMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. State v. BranamMontana Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API