Legal Opinion

Soares v. City of Oakland

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 6, 1992No. A053570PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PERLEY, J.

Appellant David C. Soares sued Zeddie Williams and their common employer, the City of Oakland, for a battery at a job site. Respondents prevailed in a jury trial. Appellant contends that the judgment must be reversed because of errors in the jury instructions and the special verdict form. The issue is whether the statute excepting “willful and unprovoked physical act[s] of aggression” by coemployees from the exclusive remedy of workers’ compensation covers all batteries at common law, or only those batteries committed with a specific intent to injure. (Lab. Code, § 3601,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Cole v. Fair Oaks Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Johns-Manville Products Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Mathews v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Hart v. National Mortgage & Land Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Torres v. Parkhouse Tire Service, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Iddings v. Mee-LeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Fretland v. County of HumboldtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Branam v. Crowder (In Re Branam)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Robles v. Agreserves, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2016

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API