Legal Opinion

In Re Grey

California Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1974No. Crim. 17156PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BURKE, J.

This case concerns the application to a parolee of precommitment custody time credit required by section 2900.5 of the Penal Code under our holding in In re Kapperman, ante, page 542 [114 Cal.Rptr. 97, 522 P.2d 657].1 Under the rationale of Kapperman, petitioner is entitled to credit for the time he served in county jail while appealing his conviction, but that credit is only to be applied against the statutory maximum and minimum of his offense. Consequently, despite petitioner’s contention herein, the credit does not advance the parole termination date fixed by the Adult…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re KappermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re MinnisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  3. In Re YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re KappermanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. In Re WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. In Re BentleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  4. People v. JourneyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. Smedley v. HoltAlaska Supreme Court · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API