Legal Opinion
Hope v. Continental Baking Co.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided January 31, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-585-RPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD L. WILLIAMS, District Judge.
This ease is before the court on the defendant’s motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Because the facts alleged by the plaintiff do not support a cause of action against this defendant, Continental Baking is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, and its motion is granted.
I
The factual history of this case is not disputed. Max Hope worked for Continental Baking Company from September 10, 1964 until he retired on June 30, 1987. While employed at Continental, Mr. Hope was a member of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hines v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Steamship Clerks Local 1624 v. Virginia International Terminals, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- Carnock v. City of DecaturAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
- Williams v. Air Wisconsin, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995
- Miller v. County of BroomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Debeikes v. Hawaiian Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2015