Legal Opinion

Carnock v. City of Decatur

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 30, 1993No. 4-93-0281PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann

In November 1992, plaintiff, Charles Carnock, filed suit against defendant, City of Decatur, seeking to recover an underpayment for unused sick days he accumulated prior to retiring. The trial court dismissed the action on defendant’s motion for plaintiff’s failure to exhaust the grievance procedure provided in the collective-bargaining agreement prior to filing suit. Plaintiff appeals, arguing that (1) his claim was not a “grievance,” as the collective-bargaining agreement defined that term, and therefore exhaustion of the grievance procedure was not required; and (2) even if his claim was a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vaca v. SipesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Republic Steel Corp. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Allied Chemical & Alkali Workers of America, Local Union No. 1 v. Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Marcatante v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Matthews v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Marconi v. City of JolietAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013
  4. Mahoney v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  5. Local 1274, Illinois Federation of Teachers v. Niles Township High School, District 219Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API