United States v. King
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge.
Richard King appeals his judgment of sentence following a conditional guilty plea to violating 18 U.S.C. § 2241(c) (Interstate Transportation to Engage in Sex with a Minor). The principal question of precedential import is whether the rule of law established in Georgia v. Randolph, 547 U.S. 103, 122-23, 126 S.Ct. 1515, 164 L.Ed.2d 208 (2006), viz., that a present and objecting resident can override another resident’s consent to search a home, applies to the seizure of a computer. We hold that it does not.
I
In August 2003, King was using the screen…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Rita v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. StabileCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Daniel SiddonsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- United States v. LarkinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Ramirez v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2012
- United States v. Kamaal MalloryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.