Grant v. State
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtLockemy, J.
In this action to declare title to tidelands, Peter D. Grant, Trustee, (Grant) argues the trial court erred in concluding he failed to rebut the State of South Carolina’s presumptive title to the tidelands adjacent to his property. We affirm.
FACTS
Grant initiated this action against the State of South Carolina pursuant to section 48-39-220 of the South Carolina Code (2008) to determine ownership of the tidelands 1 adjacent to his property. Grant’s property, known as The Fort, is 3 acres of highland on the northwest side of the island of Folly Beach. Grant’s property is bordered by…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Martin v. Lessee of WaddellSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
- Wilder Corp. v. WilkeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- United States v. PachecoSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Charleston Lumber Co. v. Miller Housing Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- East Cherry Grove Co., LLC v. State of South CarolinaCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2024