Legal Opinion
Leskovac v. Ohio Department of Transportation
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided December 31, 1990No. 90AP-559PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCormac, Judge.
Plaintiff-appellant, David W. Leskovac, appeals the judgment of the Court of Claims of Ohio in favor of defendant-appellee, the Ohio Department of Transportation (“ODOT”), finding that ODOT was not negligent in its design, construction, and maintenance of certain portions of Ohio’s Rural Appalachian Highway, specifically the intersection of State Routes 32 and 73. Appellant’s nine assignments of error are as follows:
“I. The trial court erred to the prejudice of the appellant in failing to find that appellant was negligent in not making enhancements to the intersection control…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Knickel v. Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1976
- Perkins v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- Fankhauser v. City of MansfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Felden v. Ashland Chemical Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
- Slane v. HilliardOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Dunlap v. W.L. Logan Trucking Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
- Gregory v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- Madunicky v. Ohio Department of TransportationOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.