Legal Opinion
Painewebber Incorporated v. Franklin Farnam, Robert Farnam, John Farnam and Edward Jacks
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided March 22, 1989No. 88-1169PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GRANT, Senior District Judge.
In this appeal we are asked to review the propriety of a district court order granting summary judgment based on issue preclusion principles. The appellant, PaineWeb-ber Incorporated, filed a civil action in Illinois state court against Edward Jacks. Jacks, along with Franklin Farnam, Robert Farnam, and John Farnam, subsequently filed arbitration complaints against Pai-neWebber with the National Association of Securities Dealers, Incorporated, and moved to stay the state court proceedings. PaineWebber filed for declaratory judgment in United States District Court,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Marrese v. American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In re the Arbitration between the County of Rockland & Primiano Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Morrow v. DillardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Hoffman v. HoffmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- PAINEWEBBER INCORPORATED v. Willard S. HARTMANN, Leona R. Hartmann, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Painewebber Incorporated v. Mohamad S. Elahi, Kokab Moarefi Elahi and Maryam ElahiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Painewebber Incorporated v. H. William HofmannCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,619 Edward D. Jones & Company and Gary Aleff v. Duane Sorrells, Mildred Sorrells and Curt SorrellsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Roney and Company v. Sam Kassab Akram SemaanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.