Legal Opinion
Cindy Marie McCusker v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner Social Security Administration
District Court, D. New Hampshire
Decided November 10, 2020No. 19-cv-853-PBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Cindy Marie McCusker v. Case No. 19-cv-853-PB Opinion No.
2020 DNH 196
Andrew Saul, Commissioner Social Security Administration MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Cindy Marie McCusker challenges the denial of her application for disability insurance benefits pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). She contends that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) committed reversible errors in evaluating her residual functional capacity and relying upon faulty vocational expert testimony. The Commissioner, in turn, moves for an order affirming the ALJ’s decision.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Maria S. Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Hung NGUYEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- 14 soc.sec.rep.ser. 301, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 16,883 Ernest S. Avery v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
- Purdy v. BerryhillCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sharon Begin v. Andrew Saul, Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021
- Begin v. US Social Security Administration, CommissionerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2021
- McCusker v. US Social Security Administration, CommissionerDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2020