Legal Opinion

McDaniel v. Arkansas Public Service Commission

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided October 8, 2014No. CV-13-667PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT J. GLADWIN, Chief Judge.

| ]This case comes to us from two orders of the Arkansas Public Service Commission in Docket No. 12-056-U. In Order No. 7, the Commission found that a temporary surcharge implemented by appellee Entergy Arkansas, Inc., complied with Act 310 of 1981. In Order No. 8, the Commission approved Entergy’s resulting rate schedule. The Consumer Utilities Rate Advocacy Division of the Arkansas Attorney General's Office (“the AG”) appeals both orders after unsuccessfully urging the Commission to consider certain grounds for disapproval of the surcharge. For reversal, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Craven v. Fulton Sanitation Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  3. Dachs v. HendrixSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  4. Arkansas Gas Consumers, Inc. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  5. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Fayetteville Express Pipeline, LLC v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2017
  2. McDaniel v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n.1Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014
  3. City of Gurdon, Arkansas v. At&t Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2026
  4. Clark County, Ark. v. At&t Corp.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2026
  5. McDaniel v. Ark. Pub. Serv. Comm'n.2Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API