Legal Opinion

City of Gurdon, Arkansas v. At&t Corp.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided May 20, 2026Published

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

2026 Ark. App. 346

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISIONS III & IV No. CV-24-32 CITY OF GURDON, ARKANSAS, EX REL. LARRY THOMERSON, IN HIS Opinion Delivered May 20, 2026 OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS MAYOR OF APPEAL FROM THE CLARK COUNTY GURDON, ARKANSAS, INDIVIDUALLY CIRCUIT COURT AND ON BEHALF OF A CLASS OF [NO. 10CV-18-95] SIMILARLY SITUATED PARTIES HONORABLE GARY M. ARNOLD, APPELLANT JUDGE V. AT&T CORP. AND SOUTHWESTERN BELL D/B/A AT&T ARKANSAS APPELLEES AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED AND REMANDED IN PART MIKE MURPHY, Judge This appeal arises from a class-action lawsuit filed by the city of Gurdon…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. MacSteel Division of Quanex v. Arkansas Oklahoma Gas Corp.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
  2. Central Oklahoma Pipeline, Inc. v. Hawk Field Services, LLCSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  3. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Arkansas Public Service CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2000
  4. City of Little Rock v. AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF SOUTHWEST, INC.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  5. Miller County v. Opportunities, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API