Wingo v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the CourtDavenport, J.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter for convenience referred to as the defendant, was convicted of having possession of intoxicating liquor, and sentenced to pay a fine of $50, and to be confined in the county jail for 30 days.
The condition of the record is such that it is only necessary to1 consider defendant’s first assignment of error, that the court erred in overruling her motion to suppress the evidence obtained by an unlawful search of the home and premises of the defendant. The facts disclosed on defendant’s motion to suppress shows that the officers possessed of a John Doe warrant,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Foster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
- Brandt v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Miller v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
- Ford v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Seick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1935
- Burns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1950