Legal Opinion
Citicorp Savings & Trust Co. v. Banking Board of Oklahoma
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 23, 1985No. 61663PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMERS, Justice.
Citicorp Savings and Trust Company is the successor to Cherokee Title and Trust Company, a pre-statehood corporation originally authorized to do banking, savings and trust business. Cherokee lay dormant for years before being revived by Citicorp. Citicorp sought to qualify for permission to engage in the savings and trust business in Oklahoma and so petitioned the Oklahoma State Banking Board. At stake is the “certificate of authority,” without which one may not commence such operations. The proceedings are governed by Article III of the Oklahoma Banking Code, 6 O.S.Supp.…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- American Insurance Ass'n v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Mott v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Walters v. Oklahoma Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Woods Development Co. v. Meurer Abstract & Title Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Bogle v. Banking BoardCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.