Legal Opinion

Heaton v. Imus

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 20, 1978No. 5597-1PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFarris, C.J.

— Ken and Barbara Imus, doing business as Jacaranda Land & Development Corporation, owned realty in Bellingham, Washington. Stuart D. Heaton, doing business as Heaton Construction Company, performed rehabilitation work on certain of the Imuses' properties. This action arose out of a dispute regarding the compensation agreed upon for the restoration of one of the properties.

Imus contends that the parties agreed upon an oral, implied in fact, lump-sum contract for the construction project. Heaton argues that the agreement between the parties was an oral, implied in fact, cost-plus contract. The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Bignold v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Plumbing Shop, Inc. v. PittsWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Milone & Tucci, Inc. v. Bona Fide Builders, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Dravo Corp. v. L. W. Moses Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Modern Builders, Inc. v. MankeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
  2. Heaton v. ImusWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Pitell v. King Cnty. Pub. Hosp. Dist. No. 2Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
  4. Stephen Pitell v. Evergreen HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API