Heaton v. Imus
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtFarris, C.J.
— Ken and Barbara Imus, doing business as Jacaranda Land & Development Corporation, owned realty in Bellingham, Washington. Stuart D. Heaton, doing business as Heaton Construction Company, performed rehabilitation work on certain of the Imuses' properties. This action arose out of a dispute regarding the compensation agreed upon for the restoration of one of the properties.
Imus contends that the parties agreed upon an oral, implied in fact, lump-sum contract for the construction project. Heaton argues that the agreement between the parties was an oral, implied in fact, cost-plus contract. The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Prier v. Refrigeration Engineering Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968
- Bignold v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Plumbing Shop, Inc. v. PittsWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Milone & Tucci, Inc. v. Bona Fide Builders, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1956
- Dravo Corp. v. L. W. Moses Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1971
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Modern Builders, Inc. v. MankeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1980
- Heaton v. ImusWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Pitell v. King Cnty. Pub. Hosp. Dist. No. 2Court of Appeals of Washington · 2018
- Stephen Pitell v. Evergreen HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018