Legal Opinion

Moore v. Bryson

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 28, 1971No. 7130SC180PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Plaintiff’s only assignment of error is directed at the granting of the motion for summary judgment as to the second cause of action. Summary judgment is appropriate if "the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c). The pleadings show that the defendants were appointed executors of the Estate of D. R. Bryson on 27 December 1955. The complaint in the present…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pearson v. . PearsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  2. Edwards v. Lemmond.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Pierce v. . FaisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tyson v. North Carolina National BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Moore v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Moore v. BrysonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API