Legal Opinion

Wakeman v. Paulson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1973PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcALLISTER, J.

The plaintiff brought this action to recover judgment against the directors of a corporation for a debt owing to plaintiff by the corporation. Plaintiff appeals from an adverse judgment. We affirm.

There is little dispute about the facts, most of which are documented. The plaintiff Wakeman was hired in September 1967 as sales manager for Beer Boy Corporation, an Oregon corporation. ① In May 1968 his services were terminated and in August 1968 Wake-man sued Beer Boy and its president John K. Paulson for commissions allegedly due him by Beer Boy. On August 5, 1969, Wakeman recovered judgment…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Calkins v. Wire Hardware Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  2. Darcy v. Brooklyn & New York Ferry Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1909
  3. Saracco Tank & Welding Co. v. PlatzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Wakeman v. PaulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Burke v. Marlboro Awning Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ficor, Inc. v. McHughSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. Twigg v. OpsahlCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  3. Kollman v. Cell Tech International, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  4. Robson v. SmithAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API