Tichenor v. Dodd
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Bill for discovery and relief. Hearing upon bill, answer, replication and proofs.
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The complainant, by his deed, dated the twenty-fourth September, eighteen hundred and thirty-five, conveyed to the defendant, Dodd, certain lots of land in the city of Newark, for the consideration of seven hundred and fifty dollars. At the end of the description of the premises, follows this clause, “ The above lots are conveyed subject to the payment of a certain mortgage thereon, given by the said David H. Tichenor to Oliver S. Halsted, James Dawes and Enoch Bolles, for five hundred and twenty-five dollars and thirty cents, which said mortgage, or the amount thereof, is…
2Cited by12 opinions
- Reeves v. CordesNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1931
- Meyer v. BlackerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
- Friedman v. ZuckermanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1929
- Wittson v. Englewood Plumbing Supply Co., Inc.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1937
- Fidelity Union Tr. v. Multiple RealtyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1942
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.