Olive v. Maas
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtWolf, J.
Mark Olive appeals from a final order dismissing with prejudice his three count amended complaint seeking a declaration that the statute governing the statewide registry of private attorneys available for court appointment to represent death row inmates in postconviction proceedings (Registry Act) is unconstitutional. We reverse and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.
The trial court essentially gave three reasons for dismissing Olive’s amended complaint. First, the trial court determined that there was no actual justiciable controversy between the parties because the Registry…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Pennsylvania v. FinleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Murray v. GiarratanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kozel v. OstendorfSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Graham v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
- Makemson v. Martin CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Maas v. OliveSupreme Court of Florida · 2008