Kemp v. Stanley
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Dissent
On Rehearing.
2Concurring in part, dissenting in partRogers, Justice
I agree in the holding that the judgment of the District Court, so far as it enjoins the Attorney General from superseding the District Attorney as the..adviser of the grand jury in the matters set forth in the second letter of the Attorney General addressed to the District Attorney,' is correct. The practical effect of holding otherwise would be to oust the District Attorney from his office in a manner not provided nor contemplated by law. But I do not agree in' the holding that the judgment, so far as it enjoins the Attorney General from superseding the District Attorney in the…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. ArdoinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- State v. MajorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935