Legal Opinion
State v. Ardoin
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided April 28, 1941No. 36122PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
O’NIELL, Chief Justice.
The State is appealing from a judgment quashing the indictment in each of 'these eight cases. As the motions to quash were alike in all of the cases, they were dealt with together, as in one case, by consent of all parties.
The complaint made in the motion, to quash — and maintained by the judge, in each case — was that the Attorney General, at the request of the grand jury, took over the duties of the District Attorney as the legal adviser of the grand jury in the proceedings which resulted in the indictment to these defendants, and a Special Assistant of the Attorney…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carrere v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
- State Ex Rel. De Armas v. PlattSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
- State v. MajorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
3Cited by12 opinions
- Colonial Pipeline Company v. AgertonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- State v. TheardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
- Scarborough v. Northern Assurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- State, Dept. of Highways v. Beaird-Poulan, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Succession of SaxtonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.