Legal Opinion

Nagy v. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1992No. 60216PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMM, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff Dennis Nagy was struck and injured as he drove across the newly opened southbound lanes of Highway 141. The lanes had been constructed under the direction of the Missouri Highway and Transportation Commission (MHTC).

Plaintiff sued MHTC under the sovereign immunity waiver statute for dangerous condition of a government entity’s property. He alleged MHTC’s failure to warn the new lanes were opened created the dangerous condition. The jury agreed and assessed 25% fault to MHTC.

On appeal, MHTC contends (1) the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction; (2)…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Kanagawa v. State by and Through FreemanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. Wilkes v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  3. Steele v. WoodsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  4. Alexander v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  5. Huff v. Union Electric Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Murray v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 2001
  2. Kraus v. Hy-Vee, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Linton v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Parra v. Building Erection ServicesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Williams v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API