Harrison v. S/V WANDERER

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ATLAS, District Judge.

This case, based on a salvage contract, is before the Court on the Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (“Motion”) [Doc. #49] filed by Defendant Captron Entertainment, Inc. (“Captron”). 1 Captron argues that the contract contained a “No Cure, No Pay” provision which precludes recovery by Plain tiff Clear Lake Rescue (“CLR”) because CLR did not successfully complete the salvage operation. Alternatively, Captron argues that the contract was not one for salvage because the vessel S/V WANDERER (the “WANDERER”) was not in extremis. Captron also…