Legal Opinion

E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Byrnes

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided January 9, 1939No. 160PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

At the oral argument of this case, we reversed the order and directed the lower court to appoint a master to take testimony and determine the place of residence or inhabitancy of appellee. The petition for reargument states that both parties are willing that a decision be made upon the affidavits found in the record. Upon that agreement we proceed to do so.

In this suit for a declaratory judgment, § 274d Jud.Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 400, that appellee’s patent is invalid, the jurisdiction of the district court is raised. The question is one of venue, which depends solely upon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Ennis v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  3. Zimmers v. Dodge BrothersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1927
  4. Canadian Pac. Ry. Co. v. WenhamU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1906

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Remington Rand, Inc. v. Knapp-Monarch CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. The General Tire & Rubber Company v. The Honorable R. Dorsey Watkins, United States District Judge for the Districtof MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  3. Lances v. LetzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  4. Townsend v. Bucyrus-Erie Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
  5. American Chemical Paint Co. v. Dow Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API