Legal Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Dylyn

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 2002No. 2001-2197PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} On July 17, 1998, respondent, David P. Dylyn,1 agreed to represent Christopher Stegman by refiling a personal injury lawsuit on Stegman’s behalf and by helping him to obtain driving privileges. Respondent drew up two separate contracts for these services. The first required Stegman to pay respondent a contingency fee for the “lawsuit vs. Gas USA and release of documents to DPD.” The second contract required Stegman to pay a $200 retainer for respondent’s efforts to secure the “reinstatement of driving privileges as per O.R.C. SR 657 [sic].”

{¶ 2} Stegman entered into these agreements…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. EstepOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Columbus Bar Ass'n v. PurnellOhio Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Disciplinary Counsel v. DylynOhio Supreme Court · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API