Legal Opinion

State v. Hines

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 20, 1993No. 92-1886-CRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

On this appeal, Christopher W. Hines maintains his confrontation rights were violated and the trial court erred when the court sua sponte sent to the jury a police report containing hearsay evidence from an informant who had not testified. We conclude that the trial court misused its discretion. The court did not consider whether the police report would aid the jury, would unduly prejudice Hines or could have been improperly used by the jury. Therefore, we reverse Hines' convictions and remand for a new trial.

A single individual robbed Smacker's Tavern in Kenosha and assaulted the bartender.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. RutchikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Prahl v. BrosamleCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1987
  4. State v. GollonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  5. Collier v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  2. London v. ClementsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  3. State v. CooksCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
  4. State v. MayerCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  5. State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API