Legal Opinion · Dissent

Haynes v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided April 1, 1957No. 257Published

1Dissent

Mr. Justice Burton and Mr. Justice Harlan

dissent for the reasons stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, 233 F. 2d 413. See also, Moholy v. United States, 235 F. 2d 562; I. R. C., 1954, §§ 104—106, and the accompanying report, H. R. Rep. No. 1337, 83d Cong., 2d Sess. 15, a32-a35.

Mr. Justice Whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Gordon P. Haynes and Essie M. HaynesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
  2. Anne G. Moholy, as Administratrix of the Estate of Philip F. Moholy, Deceased, and Anne Moholy v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956