Legal Opinion

Hirning v. Dunlap

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1936No. File No. 7893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff brought this action to foreclose a certain mortgage. Judgment was for plaintiff, and defendant R. H. Dunlap has attempted to appeal to this court from the judgment entered.

The specifications of error are set forth in appellants’ brief, and there are also certain so-called assignments of error. Assignments of error Nos. 1, 2, and 3 are without any support in the specifications of error, and must therefore be ignored. Hepner v. Wheatley, 33 S. D. 34, 144 N. W. 923; Sweeney v. Hewett et al, 34 S. D. 302, 148 N. W. 503. The remaining assignments of error merely assert error, but do not…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hepner v. WheatleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Reeves v. National Fire InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Sweeney v. HewettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Brown v. BrownSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Sanford v. HelgersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. JR Watkins Company v. BeiselSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Stoecker v. StoeckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API