Smith v. Rich
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.
This is an action by a pedestrian to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when struck by an automobile driven by defendant.
Defendant, for whom the jury returned a verdict, appeals from an order granting plaintiff a new trial.
The motion for a new trial was granted upon the sole ground that the court erred, as a matter of law, when it gave a portion of instruction No. 27 which dealt with the claimed contributory negligence of plaintiff.
Pursuant to Rule on Appeal 34 (3), 34A Wn. (2d) 36, defendant (appellant) filed a concise statement of the points on which he intended to rely on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Blasick v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1954
- Orr v. Schwager & Nettleton, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Fuller v. FriedmanWashington Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by7 opinions
- Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Wick v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Coyle v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- Uber v. KurbitzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
- Coyle v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.