Legal Opinion

Smith v. Rich

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1955No. 33168PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

This is an action by a pedestrian to recover damages for personal injuries sustained when struck by an automobile driven by defendant.

Defendant, for whom the jury returned a verdict, appeals from an order granting plaintiff a new trial.

The motion for a new trial was granted upon the sole ground that the court erred, as a matter of law, when it gave a portion of instruction No. 27 which dealt with the claimed contributory negligence of plaintiff.

Pursuant to Rule on Appeal 34 (3), 34A Wn. (2d) 36, defendant (appellant) filed a concise statement of the points on which he intended to rely on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blasick v. City of YakimaWashington Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Orr v. Schwager & Nettleton, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Fuller v. FriedmanWashington Supreme Court · 1925

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Wick v. IrwinWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Coyle v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  4. Uber v. KurbitzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Coyle v. Municipality of Metropolitan SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API