Legal Opinion

In re Fisher

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 4, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Determination and Findings adopted by respondent New York State Urban Development Corporation on January 31, 2001, which found, inter alia, that there is a public use, benefit or purpose to support condemna*263tion of 45 Wall Street in New York County in conjunction with respondent’s New York Stock Exchange Project, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to Eminent Domain Procedure Law § 207 seeking rejection of said Determination and Findings dismissed, without costs.

Petitioners are rent stabilized tenants at 45 Wall Street, a building whose condemnation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Joslin Manufacturing Co. v. City of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. Greenwich Associates v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Tribeca Community Ass'n v. New York State Urban Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  5. New York State School Bus Operators Ass'n v. County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. West 41st Street Realty LLC v. New York State Urban Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
  2. Anderson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API