Legal Opinion
Stein v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 30, 1981PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John S. Lockman, J.
This motion by petitioners for declaratory judgment is denied. Their application for a temporary restraining order has been previously denied.
Petitioners appear pro se seeking a declaratory judgment invalidating certain fare increases adopted by the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) and its subsidiaries, the Long Island Rail Road Corporation (LIRR) and the New York City Transportation Authority (TA). They contend that the fare increases are illegal by virtue of the *1028respondents’ failure to comply with section 96 of the Transportation Law which…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Jones v. BeameNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Levine v. Long Island Rail RoadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Glen v. RockefellerNew York Supreme Court · 1970
- Levine v. LONG ISLAND RAIL RD. CO.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
- Glen v. RockefellerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- New York Public Interest Research Group Straphangers Campaign, Inc. v. Metropolitan Transportation AuthorityNew York Supreme Court · 2003