Legal Opinion
Hurt v. Shelby County Board of Education
District Court, N.D. Alabama
Decided July 27, 2016No. Case No.: 2:13-CV-230-VEHPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
VIRGINIA EMERSON HOPKINS, United States District Judge
This case arises from Daniel Acker, Jr.’s horrific twenty-five year practice of exploiting his position as an elementary school teacher to convert the Shelby County school system into his personal sexual hunting ground. It is an action under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (codified at 20 U.S.C. § 1681-88), 42 U.S'.C. § 1983, and Alabama law by Plaintiffs Kristin Hurt (“Hurt”) and six Jane Does, named in the caption Jane Doe # 1-Jane Doe # 6 (collectively, “Jane Does”), alleging sex discrimination and…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brinkley v. WatersDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 2021
- Fick v. State Of AlabamaDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2018
- Grissom v. Verizon Wireless, Inc. (MAG+)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2019
- Johnson v. Tuskegee University (CONSENT)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2025
- Oirya v. Auburn University (CONSENT)District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.