Follette v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

RICHARD S. ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

This opinion is the second in which we attempt to sort out the procedural morass entangling this case. In this opinion we address whether Kent and Jane Follette’s individual claims, as opposed to those brought on behalf of their minor son, are barred by the Arkansas statute of limitations. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm that portion of the District Court’s summary judgment which dismisses the Follettes’ individual claims. In all other respects, we adhere to our original opinion.

I

The Follettes’ son was injured when a jug of hairspray purchased from…