Legal Opinion
State ex rel. Wilson v. Hisrich
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided March 25, 1994No. 94-522PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Per curiam
For the following reasons we deny a peremptory writ of mandamus. The Secretary of State’s motion to intervene is granted.
In his first proposition of law, relator demands a peremptory writ because respondent failed to state a reason for rejecting his petition. He cites R.C. 3501.39, which states:
“The secretary of state or a board of elections shall accept any petition described in section 3501.38 of the Revised Code unless one of the following occurs:
« * * *
“(C) The candidate’s candidacy or the petition violates the requirements of this chapter, Chapter 3513. of the Revised Code, or any other…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State ex rel. Citizens for Responsible Taxation v. Scioto County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Senn v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
- State ex rel. McMillan v. Ashtabula County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stutzman v. Madison County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
- State Ex Rel. Stewart v. Clinton County Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- State Ex Rel. Orange Township Board of Trustees v. Delaware County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2013
- State ex rel. Eshleman v. FornshellOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Stutzman v. Madison Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.