Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Wilson v. Hisrich

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1994No. 94-522PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

For the following reasons we deny a peremptory writ of mandamus. The Secretary of State’s motion to intervene is granted.

In his first proposition of law, relator demands a peremptory writ because respondent failed to state a reason for rejecting his petition. He cites R.C. 3501.39, which states:

“The secretary of state or a board of elections shall accept any petition described in section 3501.38 of the Revised Code unless one of the following occurs:

« * * *

“(C) The candidate’s candidacy or the petition violates the requirements of this chapter, Chapter 3513. of the Revised Code, or any other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Citizens for Responsible Taxation v. Scioto County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. State ex rel. Senn v. Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  3. State ex rel. McMillan v. Ashtabula County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1992

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stutzman v. Madison County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State Ex Rel. Stewart v. Clinton County Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State Ex Rel. Orange Township Board of Trustees v. Delaware County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  4. State ex rel. Eshleman v. FornshellOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Stutzman v. Madison Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API