Legal Opinion

PRESTON MINING COMPANY v. Matney

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 28, 1955No. Record 4399PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtEggleston, J.

This appeal is a sequel to that involved in William S. Stokes, Jr., Inc. v. Matney, 194 Va. 339, 73 S. E. (2d) 269. In that case we affirmed a decree of the lower court which held that William S. Stokes, Jr., Inc., did not have the right to haul its coal, machinery and supplies over a private road which led across the land of McKinley Matney.

The present action at law was brought by Matney against Stokes, whose name had been changed to Preston Mining Company, to recover the sum of $15,000 alleged to be due for the use and occupancy of the plaintiff’s land in hauling coal and supplies over this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Raven Red Ash Coal Co. v. BallSupreme Court of Virginia · 1946
  2. Eppes's Executors v. Cole & WifeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1809
  3. William S. Stokes, Jr., Inc. v. MatneySupreme Court of Virginia · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Clyborne v. McNeilSupreme Court of Virginia · 1960
  2. United States v. 180.37 Acres of Land, More or LessDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 1966
  3. Molinary v. Powell Mountain Coal Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API