True v. Amerail Corp.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENRY, Judge.
The sole question in this Workmen’s Compensation action is whether a Tennessee resident, employed principally in Tennessee under a contract made in Tennessee, who is injured while working in Virginia, and who accepts benefits under the Virginia Workmen’s Compensation law, is barred from a recovery under Tennessee Law. The Chancellor sustained the employer’s motion for a summary judgment. We affirm.
I
Plaintiff is a resident of Washington County, Tennessee, where Amerail maintains offices and where the contract of employment was made. He was employed principally in Tennessee;…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Industrial Comm'n of Wis. v. McCartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Thomas v. Transport Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1976
- Tidwell v. Chattanooga Boiler & Tank Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1931
3Cited by8 opinions
- Perkins v. BE & K, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1990
- Gray v. Holloway Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Bradshaw v. Old Republic Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Roadway Express, Inc. v. WarrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Hale v. Commercial Union Assurance CompaniesTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.