Legal Opinion · Concurrence

James L. Hodge v. The Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Company, a Foreign Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1977No. 74-2162Published

1Concurrence

HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge,

specially concurring:

While I join in the result reached by Judge Renfrew, I cannot concur in his reasoning in concluding that Section 605, 47 U.S.C. § 605 (1976), does not prohibit the use of pen registers and that the Fourth Amendment does not restrict the use of a pen register.

I

The problem presented by this appeal is one of interpretation: Did Congress intend to permit or prohibit pen registers under Section 605? This process of interpretation requires us to explore both legislative history and the judicial reception to pen registers under Section 605. While Judge…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. United States v. Pasquale Falcone Appeal of Pasquale Falconio in No. 73-2013. Appeal of Wally Berger in No. 73-2109Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Richard Michael King, AKA Richard HansenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API